Michele Eccher
On this page
A useful competitor analysis begins with a decision, not a spreadsheet. Define what you need to choose, select competitors that customers genuinely compare, collect the same evidence for each and analyse audience, positioning, offer, proof, experience, visibility and route to market. Finish with a small number of implications the business can act on; do not copy surface tactics.
Competitor research becomes noise when it gathers screenshots, follower counts and feature lists without a commercial question. It also misleads when the loudest search result is treated as the only alternative customers consider.
For market research, positioning maps and prioritised opportunities, see Qreativa’s competitor analysis service.
Question
The decision the analysis must improve.
Set
Direct, indirect and search competitors relevant to that question.
Evidence
Comparable observations separated from assumptions.
Choice
A prioritised implication for position, offer or execution.
Write the question the analysis must answer
Positioning
Which valued territory is crowded, credible or still open?
Offer
How do alternatives package value, price, risk and next steps?
Go to market
Where and how do competitors create or capture demand?
Experience
Which parts of discovery, evaluation or purchase create a difference?
Set the market, audience, geography and time horizon. ‘Analyse our competitors’ is too broad. ‘Understand how Italian mid-market buyers compare outsourced marketing partners before we rewrite the offer’ produces a usable research boundary.
Include the alternatives customers actually consider
| Type | Definition | Why include it |
|---|---|---|
| Direct | Similar offer for a similar audience and need | Shows the closest commercial comparison |
| Indirect | Different solution to the same underlying problem | Reveals substitute behaviours and budget competition |
| Search competitor | Wins visibility for queries relevant to the journey | Shows who shapes expectations before supplier evaluation |
| Aspirational reference | Strong example from an adjacent or more mature market | Expands the range of credible possibilities |
| Status quo | Doing nothing, using an internal workaround or delaying | Often the real alternative a new offer must defeat |
Collect the same observable evidence for every competitor
Create a repeatable evidence sheet
- Primary audience and situations addressed
- Core promise, category language and stated difference
- Offer structure, pricing visibility and commercial next step
- Types of proof, specificity and recency
- Website, search and conversion experience
- Content themes and apparent role in the journey
- Paid, organic, partnership or sales distribution signals
- Important gaps, contradictions and unanswered questions
- Source URL, date observed and confidence level
Separate observation from interpretation. ‘The pricing page has three tiers’ is evidence. ‘They compete on simplicity’ is an inference that needs support from language, structure and customer response. Record both, but label them differently.
Compare on decision criteria, not internal categories
Feature tables often reflect what teams can easily collect rather than how customers choose. Use interviews, sales notes, reviews and search behaviour to identify the criteria that reduce uncertainty: expertise, speed, risk, ease, support, integration, local presence, evidence or total cost.
| Criterion | Evidence to inspect | Question |
|---|---|---|
| Relevance | Audience language, use cases and entry points | Does the buyer feel recognised? |
| Value | Outcome, scope, pricing logic and trade-offs | Is the benefit concrete enough to compare? |
| Trust | Cases, data, credentials, people and transparency | What makes the promise believable? |
| Effort | Navigation, forms, onboarding and handoffs | How hard is it to evaluate and start? |
| Risk | Terms, guarantees, governance and limitations | What fear is reduced or left unresolved? |
Use a map only when the axes reflect valued differences
Choose two criteria
Use dimensions that matter to customers and vary meaningfully in the market.
Define each extreme
Write observable rules for low and high positions.
Plot with evidence
Place competitors from messages, offers and experience, not intuition alone.
Test the gap
Check whether an open space is desirable, credible and economically viable.
An empty quadrant is not automatically an opportunity. It may be empty because customers do not value it or because the promise is difficult to deliver. Combine the map with demand, capability and profitability evidence.
Turn patterns into choices without copying competitors
| Pattern | Possible implication | Validation needed |
|---|---|---|
| Every competitor uses vague claims | Lead with specific proof and a clear mechanism | Do customers value and understand the proof? |
| Evaluation information is hidden | Make scope, process or price logic easier to assess | Will transparency improve qualified action? |
| One channel dominates visibility | Build a differentiated route or contest the channel deliberately | Can the business sustain quality and cost? |
| A valued need is poorly served | Adapt the offer around that unmet job | Is the need frequent, urgent and profitable enough? |
Prioritise implications by customer value, commercial effect, evidence strength, difficulty and strategic fit. Feed the result into the broader digital marketing strategy rather than leaving it in a research deck.
Keep the analysis current, lawful and proportionate
- Use public, lawfully accessed information and respect platform terms
- Do not impersonate customers or obtain confidential material deceptively
- Store only evidence necessary for the business question
- Date observations because offers, pages and campaigns change
- Monitor a small set of high-value signals between deeper reviews
- Trigger a fresh analysis after a market entry, major launch or positioning shift
- Review conclusions when customer evidence contradicts them
Competitor analysis FAQs
What is a competitor analysis?
It is a structured comparison of the alternatives customers consider, using observable evidence about audience, positioning, offer, proof, experience, visibility and route to market. Its purpose is to improve a specific business decision, not collect everything competitors do.
How do you choose competitors to analyse?
Include direct competitors, indirect substitutes, organisations shaping search visibility, the status quo and selected aspirational references when relevant. Validate the set with customers, sales evidence and market behaviour rather than internal familiarity alone.
How many competitors should be included?
Use the smallest set that represents the meaningful alternatives and patterns for the decision. A focused comparison of five relevant choices can be more valuable than fifty shallow profiles. Add a competitor only when it can change the conclusion.
Which data should a competitor analysis collect?
Collect comparable evidence about audiences, messages, offers, pricing logic, proof, customer journey, visibility, content and distribution. Record sources and dates, and separate direct observations from interpretations.
What is a positioning map?
It plots competitors across two dimensions that customers value and that vary in the market. Define observable rules for each axis and test whether any apparent gap has demand, credibility and economic viability before treating it as an opportunity.
How often should competitor analysis be updated?
Monitor a small number of decision-critical signals regularly and complete a deeper review after major launches, market changes or strategic decisions. Fast-moving markets may need more frequent checks; stable categories may not.
